Greene Ford Compares 2018 Ford Taurus VS 2018 Nissan Maxima Near Flowery Branch, GA

Responsive image

2018 Ford Taurus

Responsive image
VS

2018 Nissan Maxima

Safety Comparison

The Taurus offers all-wheel drive to maximize traction under poor conditions, especially in ice and snow. The Maxima doesn’t offer all-wheel drive.

The Taurus Limited/SHO’s optional lane departure warning system alerts a temporarily inattentive driver when the vehicle begins to leave its lane and gently nudges the vehicle back towards its lane. The Maxima doesn’t offer a lane departure warning system.

Both the Taurus and the Maxima have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, rearview cameras, available collision warning systems, blind spot warning systems, front and rear parking sensors, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Ford Taurus is safer than the Nissan Maxima:

 

Taurus

Maxima

 

Driver

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

182

220

Neck Compression

13 lbs.

60 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

68/69 lbs.

214/398 lbs.

 

Passenger

STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

Chest Compression

.5 inches

.7 inches

Neck Injury Risk

32%

37%

Neck Compression

24 lbs.

56 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

316/229 lbs.

554/51 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Ford Taurus is safer than the Nissan Maxima:

 

Taurus

Maxima

 

Front Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

103

295

Abdominal Force

173 G’s

188 G’s

 

Rear Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

284

391

Spine Acceleration

30 G’s

57 G’s

 

Into Pole

STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

Spine Acceleration

53 G’s

53 G’s

Hip Force

743 lbs.

997 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

Warranty Comparison

There are almost 3 times as many Ford dealers as there are Nissan dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Taurus’ warranty.

Reliability Comparison

The Taurus has a standard “limp home system” to keep drivers from being stranded if most or all of the engine’s coolant is lost. The engine will run on only half of its cylinders at a time, reduce its power and light a warning lamp on the dashboard so the driver can get to a service station for repairs. The Maxima doesn’t offer a lost coolant limp home mode, so a coolant leak could strand you or seriously damage the car’s engine.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2017 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Ford vehicles are better in initial quality than Nissan vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Ford fourth in initial quality, above the industry average. With 7 more problems per 100 vehicles, Nissan is ranked 10th.

Engine Comparison

The Taurus SHO’s standard 3.5 turbo V6 produces 65 more horsepower (365 vs. 300) and 89 lbs.-ft. more torque (350 vs. 261) than the Maxima’s 3.5 DOHC V6.

As tested in Motor Trend the Taurus SHO 3.5 turbo V6 is faster than the Nissan Maxima:

 

Taurus

Maxima

Zero to 30 MPH

1.8 sec

2.4 sec

Zero to 60 MPH

5.2 sec

6 sec

Zero to 80 MPH

8.4 sec

9.6 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

12.9 sec

14.7 sec

Quarter Mile

13.7 sec

14.5 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

103 MPH

99.3 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Ford Taurus uses regular unleaded gasoline (premium recommended on Taurus SHO for maximum performance). The Maxima requires premium, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.

The Taurus has a gallon more fuel capacity than the Maxima (19 vs. 18 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.

The Taurus has a standard cap-less fueling system. The fuel filler is automatically opened when the fuel nozzle is inserted and automatically closed when it’s removed. This eliminates the need to unscrew and replace the cap and it reduces fuel evaporation, which causes pollution. The Maxima doesn’t offer a cap-less fueling system.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

For better stopping power the Taurus’ brake rotors are larger than those on the Maxima:

 

Taurus

Maxima

Front Rotors

13.86 inches

12.6 inches

Rear Rotors

13.58 inches

12.13 inches

Tires and Wheels Comparison

For better traction, the Taurus Limited’s tires are larger than the largest tires available on the Maxima (255/45R19 vs. 245/45R18).

For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Taurus offers optional 20-inch wheels. The Maxima’s largest wheels are only 19-inches.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

The Taurus has standard front and rear gas-charged shocks for better control over choppy roads. The Maxima’s suspension doesn’t offer gas-charged shocks.

The Taurus SHO’s drift compensation steering can automatically compensate for road conditions which would cause the vehicle to drift from side to side, helping the driver to keep the vehicle straight more easily. The Maxima doesn’t offer drift compensation steering.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Taurus’ wheelbase is 3.6 inches longer than on the Maxima (112.9 inches vs. 109.3 inches).

For better handling and stability, the track (width between the wheels) on the Taurus is 2.9 inches wider in the front and 3.1 inches wider in the rear than on the Maxima.

The Taurus SHO handles at .87 G’s, while the Maxima Platinum pulls only .81 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

Chassis Comparison

The front grille of the Taurus (except SHO) uses electronically controlled shutters to close off airflow and reduce drag when less engine cooling is needed. This helps improve highway fuel economy. The Maxima doesn’t offer active grille shutters.

Passenger Space Comparison

Because it has more passenger and cargo room, the Taurus is rated a Large car by the EPA, while the Maxima is rated a Mid-size.

The Taurus has 3.6 cubic feet more passenger volume than the Maxima (102.2 vs. 98.6).

The Taurus has 2.1 inches more front hip room, 1.2 inches more front shoulder room, 1.1 inches more rear headroom, 3.9 inches more rear legroom, 2.3 inches more rear hip room and 1.2 inches more rear shoulder room than the Maxima.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

The Taurus has a much larger trunk than the Maxima (20.1 vs. 14.3 cubic feet).

Ergonomics Comparison

The power windows standard on both the Taurus and the Maxima have locks to prevent small children from operating them. When the lock on the Taurus is engaged the driver can still operate all of the windows, for instance to close one opened by a child. The Maxima prevents the driver from operating the other windows just as it does the other passengers.

In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the Taurus’ exterior PIN entry system. The Maxima doesn’t offer an exterior PIN entry system.

While driving with high beams on, sensitive light sensors standard on the Taurus Limited/SHO detect other vehicles which could be blinded and automatically switch to low beams. The Maxima doesn’t offer automatic dimming high beams.

Both the Taurus and the Maxima offer available heated front seats. The Taurus Limited/SHO also has standard heated rear seats to keep those passengers extremely comfortable in the winter. Heated rear seats aren’t available in the Maxima.

The Taurus Limited/SHO’s optional Active Park Assist can parallel park or back into a parking spot by itself, with the driver only controlling speed with the brake pedal. The Maxima doesn’t offer an automated parking system.

Economic Advantages Comparison

Insurance will cost less for the Taurus owner. The Complete Car Cost Guide estimates that insurance for the Taurus will cost $1000 to $5285 less than the Maxima over a five-year period.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Taurus is less expensive to operate than the Maxima because typical repairs cost much less on the Taurus than the Maxima, including $8 less for a starter, $201 less for fuel injection, $130 less for a fuel pump and $67 less for front struts.

IntelliChoice estimates that five-year ownership costs (depreciation, financing, insurance, fuel, fees, repairs and maintenance) for the Ford Taurus will be $4123 to $9789 less than for the Nissan Maxima.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.

Disclaimer

Purchase prices plus tax, tag, title, and Georgia lemon law fee. Prices include the listed rebates and incentives. Please verify all information. We are not responsible for typographical, technical, or misprint errors. Inventory is subject to prior sale. Contact us via phone or email for more details.